Nearby was an Emmaus Community so I popped in and took a look around at the furniture store which used to be a consecrated chapel and had some beans on toast in their unconsecrated cafe. If you don't know anything about Emmaus a charity supporting homeless people, I'll give you a general introduction lifted from the Emmaus website.
'The first Emmaus Community was founded in Paris in 1949 by Father Henri-Antoine Groues, better known as the Abbé Pierre, a Catholic priest, MP and former member of the French Resistance during the Second World War. As an MP, he fought to provide homes for those who lived on the streets of Paris'
'Emmaus Communities spread across France, as the Abbé Pierre brought the horrors faced by the poor to the world's attention. One January day in 1954 the Abbé Pierre learnt that the baby of a homeless couple had frozen to death in the night. Some days later he heard that an old woman had died of hypothermia on the streets having been evicted from her home. Angered by these needless deaths, Abbé Pierre sent an open letter to newspapers and made a radio appeal to the nation. It turned Emmaus into a major international charity. The French public responded and gifts and support flooded in. Emmaus Communities opened across France. Abbé Pierre became an international figure and travelled the world spreading the word about Emmaus, causing Communities to be established in mainland Europe, French West Africa, the Far East and South America. Each one retains the ideals of the first Communities - giving people the chance to support themselves and help others.'
All very good and laudable. So, don't get me wrong when I say what I'm about to say. The work of Emmaus in the UK at combatting homelessness and helping people find their feet in life is highly successful. The founder of Emmaus, who we know now as Abbe Pierre, I believe, was a man of heroic virtue who follows in a rich long line of Franciscan Priests who dedicated their energy, life, work, skills, talents and love to the abandoned, the dispossessed and homeless.
![]() |
| Founder of Emmaus, Abbe Pierre |
I talked to one of the 'companions' there, I shaln't give the name. A 'companion' is a volunteer who lives and works in the community. I asked the companion how they were. The companion said 'okay'. I asked how long the companion had been there. The companion said '3 months'. I asked whether they enjoyed the work. The companion said, "Well, it is either this or the streets," which, I thought immediately, was not exactly a glowing endorsement of Emmaus. I found it rather disturbing, since men have been known to have said the same thing about prison.
So, we talked a little and I discovered that Emmaus in the UK require that the 'companions', a name for those who decide to live there, having been referred by hostels or local councils, give up their benefits (JSA/Income Support/DLA etc) in order to live there in a safe community for the vulnerable and homeless. In return, they are provided with accommodation, obviously, a room, a shower, heating and, I think and certainly hope, food.
I asked this particular 'companion' how many hours they worked a week. The companion answered that they work a week of 9am - 5pm, 5 days a week. There is a mixture of tasks, some are drivers, collecting unwanted goods from donors around Brighton, Hove and the surrounding area. Some are working in the kitchen. Some are cleaning, gardening, doing a bit of labouring, furniture restoration and the rest. It is a big house and I'd imagine it needs quite some work on it. The companions all work a 9-5 job and get two days off a week.
"Gosh," I said, "I hope they pay you for working 9am - 5pm, five days a week?" Afterall, as Catholics, we all know that to defraud the poor, or to deny the labourer his wages is a sin crying out to Heaven for vengeance.
"Yes," she said, "I receive £38 a week."
I looked at the companion, having done a very quick calculation in my head and said, "That's really not very much money at all."
It was then that the companion said, "I know...but it is either this or the streets."
Stay with me on this one and hear me out. Apparently, 'companions' do receive £49 a week after the first year but for the first year only £38. Now, I understand that in becoming a 'companion' with Emmaus, many homeless men and women find refuge, strength and a great sense of community where once there was none. In many ways it continues to fulfill the mission of its founder.
The great injustice of Emmaus, however, is that the 'companions', all poor, many destitute and homeless, in agreeing to live there and work hard for the community for seemingly between 77p and £1 an hour, make a commitment, of almost Franciscan proportions, to voluntary poverty. Not only do they do this, but many do so, not out of a desire to wed Lady Poverty and live in community, but because they have been referred there by councils and life in inner city hostels, or indeed the street, is utterly intolerable. Emmaus is a way out of a vicious cycle. In other words, some are living there because it is a good and healthy place to be and others are living and working there because they feel they have no other choice. I couldn't help thinking that Emmaus is, in fact, a modern poorhouse, a kind of workhouse for the poor and, in a way, a kind of slavery.
"How many people move on from Emmaus and re-establish themselves in the community?" I asked one of the workers there, a staff member, who, I believe, is paid a standard wage.
"Well, we're not really about 'moving people on'", he answered, "We work together as a community."
'Uh-huh,' I thought, 'You work together as a community but you get paid about £20,000 a year while they work for 77p an hour.'
I wish I said that, but instead I asked, "But some workers here are paid formally, have an annual wage, right?"
"Yes," he said, "Some workers here are paid an annual wage".
"I have a couple of friends who are homeless," I said, "What chance they could be referred here?"
He answered, "We have a long waiting list here, at least 12 people are waiting to get in here. Maybe he could try another Emmaus in the country."
Indeed, their waiting list is long. People are desperate to get out of the hostels hamster wheel that comes from being homeless in Brighton. However, it doesn't look good for those who are waiting to get in to Emmaus, since, once there, few of the homeless actually leave. Given that some staff, as you can see from the screenshot of their 'jobs' section, are on a good salary and the homeless are on 77p - £1 an hour, it struck me that Emmaus are manning something of a workhouse for the poor.
The homeless have been given a purpose there, sure, something we all crave, perhaps even institutionalised there. Many people struggle to live on the 'outside world'. To live in a Community, even if it means working all day and nearly all week long for peanuts, can be quite appealing if you find it hard to cope in wider society.
Unfortunately, however, there appeared to be a blindness among the 'companions' about there existing anything in between being a companion at Emmaus and sleeping in inner city hostels or sleeping rough. The two companions that I talked to seemed to have forgotten entirely about the idea of independent living - like, you know - having a flat or having a flatshare, or building a life outside of Emmaus, but, then again, how easy would it be to save up for a deposit for a flat or a flatshare outside of the Community and live independently, when you receive £38 - £49 a week? I mean, at Emmaus you may have most things paid for, but you'd need that 'pocket money' to buy toiletries, clothes, a bit of food, top up your mobile and all the rest. How would you get out of there once you'd recovered, found your feet and go out and meet the love of your life and settle down with someone or build a relationship with someone, or put roots down in a town and all the rest of the things we take for granted?
After all, if a homeless charity is there to do anything, it is to 'serve first the one who suffers most', as the founder said. One 'companion' said, "It is either this or St Patrick's Nightshelter". St Patrick's is a nightshelter which hit the news locally because the Anglican vicar who founded it and his family appeared to be driving around in Ferraris and were all conveniently trustees of the Lorica St Patrick's Trust, leading some to accuse the vicar who then fled Brighton and its local news reporters, of "tramp-farming".
![]() |
| A workhouse in Victorian Britain |
One would have thought so, but perhaps not. The great sin of Emmaus, or rather the terrible sin of those who run it, is not just that they get the homeless to work for 77p an hour, but that they refuse to work for the same wage themselves. The paid workers of the community no longer live in solidarity with the poorest, something that the founder, a Franciscan at heart, most certainly did do. Emmaus continue to claim to be running 'communities' across the UK, yet if it is truly a community, then why are some men and women on £15,000 - £37,000 a year or more and some men and women working for less than £1 an hour. Where is the justice in that? There is none - it is a shocking scandal and crime against Justice that Emmaus can any longer even claim to be a charity working for the poorest.
Charlatans! For, as you can see, the screenshot image which headlines this blog post shows that Emmaus, who do indeed take the housing benefits of the homeless who live there for their, ahem, "running costs", are able to pay some of their dedicated staff relatively well. What is the chance of any of the 'companions', the very poor, the vulnerable homeless, getting a job with Emmaus for £25,000 - £37,000 a year? I don't know, but possibly not that good!
That is why I came away from Emmaus rather disturbed and concerned. There is something strange about the Emmaus Community in Portslade. People come to their cafe from around the local, surrounding area. Many of those who come to visit, walk around the gardens, have food and coffee in the cafe and look at some second hand furniture are wealthy - substantially more wealthy than those who are doing the labour. And yet, Emmaus's cafe is an inversion of the Gospel. It is anti-Christ. Perhaps, once the founder of these inspiring movements die (yes, often they are Catholic Priests) it does not take long to be secularised and its mission to be distorted, de-Christianised, worldly, superficial and even usurped by the Devil. After all, the consecrated chapel is now a furniture shop. Even the little grotto of Our Lady of Lourdes and St Bernadette is overgrown with weeds and ivy, left unattended. Abbe Pierre's mission was to serve the poorest, save souls and preach the Gospel.
And yet, there, at Emmaus, the poor serve the rich food and drink, for next to nothing in return. According to Our Blessed Saviour, it is not the calling of the poor to serve the rich for the love of God, as slave masters presumably justified their unjust employment arrangements, but the rich who are called to serve the poor for the love of God. Furthermore, if you are going to set up a charity, a community of people willing to be full-time volunteers in serving the poorest, it really is rather important that that policy goes for all workers - not one policy for the homeless workers and another policy for the other, 'real' workers! Otherwise, it is a con, a fraud, a sham charity that has betrayed its mission and now works not to serve the poor but to defraud the poor of their wages while others live off what rightfully belongs to them! I wonder what the Director of Emmaus UK is paid annually? I'm quite sure it wasn't Abbe Pierre who set up the wage structure!
Once you call yourself a charity, you see, you can get away with just about anything. Just look at Marie Stopes International. They're a charity and they get away with murder.




19 comments:
I think that was one of the deepest posts I've ever seen on this blog! Excellent and thought provoking.
i don't think you've taken into account contributions towards their meals and charges for utility bills (electric, gas, water etc) as well as other costs eg council tax contributions.
as you know housing benefit does not include payments towards any of the above plus charges towards support staff would need to be paid by the service users as this is not covered by housing benefit. if 24 hour staffing is provided then this could also add up to be quite a substantial amount.
rather than casting stones without the benefit of the full facts, why don't you direct emmaus to your article and ask for a reply.
it can be quite surprisng how these extra costs and charges can add up and may account for why the money in the service users pay packets appear to be so little.
if you are right in what you claim then these people are being paid less than minimum wage which would be illegal, and therefore could be challenged. i doubt very much that a charity would break the law especially if they accept referrals from the local council who would (should?) have checked these things out before agreeing to work in partnership with the charity.
i would be interested in hearing a follow-up to this story. indeed, i think you have a moral responsibility to check the full facts out properly before making your assertions which appear to be founded on little else than hearsay and assumptions.
Hi Laurence,
can I just make a comment about your new look website, it's absolutely terrible!!!
It takes ages to load and scrolling down is very clunky, some of the pictures overlap with the commentary so that either you can't read it or you can't click on the links for comments.
I'm guessing you readership figures have really dropped because to be quite honest it's so irritating it's not worth the effort.
Why not simplify your blog again and make it more user friendly. I don't know if you've had any other complaints?
No, yours is the first, blog reviewer. I looked at my blog at another computer today and it came up fine.
Maybe think of getting a new computer?
Second Opinion, I'm only relaying what I was told by the companions and the staff. I'm not challenging the wage - I'm challenging the hypocrisy of one wage rule for the homeless and another for those who are not homeless.
I used to work for ATD Fourth World in London. Everyone was on the same wage - from the National Co-ordinator down - the wage only went up if you had children to look after, feed, educate, the rest. That, too, was founded by a Catholic Priest. The wage was low but everyone knew where they stood - it was fair - and totally voluntary.
Dear Laurence,
It's a bit more complicated than £1/hour vs £27,000 (about £13/hour).
The homeless workers seem to get their wage PLUS accomodation, food, heating, electric, support, etc. etc. Yes some of that is paid for through their benefits, but probably not all. However the outside workers don't seem to get that, so have to pay for their living costs (and possibly support their families) out of their salary, as well as paying tax on it.
So what you'd need is a rough value of the non-cash benefits that the homeless workers get, and add that on to the £1 per hour. Then take the tax off the outside worker's salary. Then compare the two.
I suspect it still won't be equal, but at least we'll know how unequal.
Of course that still leaves your other concerns, that this organisation no longer seems to be operating as a community.
you seem to have missed the point lorrie, you have an obligation to check the actual facts rather than relying on unproven hearsay and assumptions before putting up your story. not to do so is to be the cause of scandal and is a SIN.
The facts are they are paid diddly squat for working their nuts off.
There is something rotten in the land.
Laurence, I also find your blog slow to load and difficult to navigate with firefox, even though I have faster internet here than you get in Britain. And I am not spending money on a new computer. It is only 5 years old so has plenty of life left in it.
Well Lozza, what can I say except you've proven that you're just shooting from the hip once again with scant regard for any reasoned thought or discussion about anything that doesn't fit in with your presumptions.
Oh and I too find your new blog layout is very un user friendly. It takes ages to load and scroll and i've got a new computer. Perhaps you should try listening to your readers for a change?
Its likely that it is a work house scenario. People work a FULL week for very little even in the retail or drivers sector and the 'charity' still claims full housing benefits for each person which feeds the coffers. I've also heard that the people living there are forbidden to take on work in their spare time, regardless of their skills, to speed up the moving on process. It would seem they become institutionalized.
I know someone who is a companion at Emmaus. He not only works as you describe, but he does not get a lunch hour. He has to eat his lunch in the shop while on duty. He would love to leave but on the income they are paid, can never in a million years save up money to strike out on his own, on his terms. For some, Emmaus is the answer for the rest of their lives. For him, Emmaus was the answer at a crisis moment in his life but once there, its very difficult to leave without family or friends to support you while you wait for social benefits to kick in and provide for you while you look for a job. And apparently in the first year, if you do find a job elsewhere, you have to move out immediately....again....you would have to have family or friends who would let you move in with them while you build up funds for your own place. Once in Emmaus, it would take an act of charity to get out of there. Recently, the staff of ten were voted a total increase of 50 000 pounds for the forthcoming year. Companions were told that no increase would be forthcoming for them for the next 3 years.
That's disgusting!
Some people might think that Emmaus saves the taxpayer the benefits which companions are not allowed to draw but in fact, Emmaus receives 200 odd pounds per week per companion. A companion who makes problems in some way, is booted out on the street either as a temporary measure to teach him a lesson or permanently. One can understand the need for discipline but imagine the impact on the residents who see their friends coming and going in this way. When it happens too often, morale is low. As to expense of maintaining the Emmaus properties, its been known at at least one place of a companion systematically painting out and recarpeting the entire building for the price of his wages.
I'm a companion at Emmaus Brighton and have been for a number of years. I'm proud of what I do there and was quite sad to read some of the misinformation and nonsense written in this blog. 49 pounds a week might not seem like a lot of money, but please bear in mind, this is disposable income, never in my life can I remember having that much money in my pocket at the end of the week. I have to work a full week for my money and accommodation; who doesn't? As for the possibility of Emmaus employing Companions, a number of staff at Emmaus Brighton were Companions. I have considered becoming a member of staff at another community on a number of occasions, but have decided against it, as I actually like being a Companion. This does not mean that I'm not involved in the organisation, I'm a trustee of another community. Emmaus does not receive 200 pounds p/w per Companion, nothing like. The staff have not recieved a £50000 pay rise, where did you get that idea?
As for people being asked to leave, I can tell you the effect it has on other Companions, if someone is being that disruptive, we're generally glad to see the back of them for a while, this makes the Community a much safer,more settled place to live.
It is true that Emmaus can be difficult to move on from in your first year, but how many people can just up sticks and move on to a new home and job, just like that? After you've been in Emmaus a year the moving on policy is very supportive. It's true that some people are not happy in Emmaus, and use it as a way off the streets and nothing else, it doesn't suit everybody, but such is life. It is not run contrary to the intentions of Abbe Pierre, he visited twice and told us so. There is much more I could write about life at Emmaus, but I would prefer to extend an invitation to anyone who would like to visit and speak to me personally, my name is Nick Miller, and I would be happy to talk to them about life as a Companion, and give them a tour of the Community, which I'm proud to be a member of.
@Nick: Do the companions at ALL Emmaus centres receive 49 pounds a week? The person I know at a different centre says he receives closer to 30 pounds a week. Is he lying to gain sympathy perhaps? In the name of transparency, are you allowed to divulge exactly how much Emmaus receives per companion per week from the State? Are you allowed to divulge the AVERAGE annual salary of the staff at an Emmaus centre? Do the salaries vary from centre to centre or is it consistent across the country? I just wondered whether the salaries of staff and companions are dependent on how much slog the companions put into it or whether it is centrally funded in some way, irrespective of the success of the furniture/shop business.
@Nick: When a resident DOES get kicked out and suspended for months at a time, what money does he live on in the interim? Does Emmaus continue to pay him his wages while they draw his benefits? If he reclaims State benefits so he can afford to rent a room and feed himself, does Emmaus keep his room for him? And while he waits for his benefits, what does he live on if there is no family or friends to sponge off? I genuinely am interested in the answers to these questions.
Another thing I would like to know from anybody .....NO money is paid into the national health or pension fund for each companion. True? This obviously must affect the government pension they receive eventually in old age. Imagine leaving Emmaus after 10 years ...one would have a 10 year gap in pension contributions....is this equal to an unemployed person on benefits? Do pension contributions to national coffers cease when you are unemployed and on benefits?
rent for a room in a shared house £70 per week (£3640 per year)
food costs: £25 per week (£1300 per year)
bills cost... I average about £100 a month including council tax/electric/gas/water in/water out etc considering how bills have increased (1200 per year)
Disposable income: £38 per week (£1976 per year)
Cost of staff (and as many homeless people have a history of abuse, mental illness and substance misuse it is important to have trained and experienced staff available to support the clients and keep the structure of the service running... and staff require ongoing training and this, as well as their wages cost money).
Even without the staff costs the clients are looking at receiving the equivalent of £8116 a year or £4.16 per hour and that's before we take the staffing costs into account.
The conditions of traditional work houses were appauling including chaining up the "insane", separating parents from children and never allowing them to go outside.
Many hard working people have £30-70 disposible income to live on a week after expenses and they don't have staff support 24/7
Many people who arrive at a place like emmaus have poor independent living skills and so choose to remain in the only system they have found works for them in the long term... for those in this position the staff are an important part of their recovery...
now perhaps it could be more recovery focused but the money side of things..... the minimum wage is a few quid more than the true income for these individuals and I think its safe to assume that the staff account for the difference.
Post a Comment