Survey Suggests Catechesis Not Going So Well

According to The Telegraph

'Almost half of Catholics surveyed did not know that their church teaches that the bread and wine used in Communion actually become the body and blood of Christ.' 

This was a US study into the knowledge of religion comparing that of atheists, agnostics and religious believers. No 'only in America' comments, please, because, let's face it, it is highly likely that there is a similar ignorance of Church Teaching in the UK as well.

The Holy Father very much desires an 'educated laity'. This study gives us more evidence as to why.

Comments

Patricius said…
I am not sure that the people conducting such surveys appreciate irony or sarcasm. In my own experience the temptation to give stupid answers to basic knowledge questions can be overwhelming. In some instances too it is possible that those questioned might feel intimidated by the questioner.
28 September 2010 at 20:04
pattif said…
Don't count on it, Patricius. I don't believe that anyone who genuinely understood what it means for the body, blood, soul and divinity to be entirely present in the Blessed Sacrament could joke about it.
28 September 2010 at 22:10
georgem said…
That's a fair point Patricius. And I'd be inclined to agree with you had I not heard the priest commentator for the Beatification Mass say something like: "leading us to the bread and wine of salvation" in reference to the Consecration.
28 September 2010 at 22:35
St Malachy said…
Given that the only exposure most Catholics have to Catholic theology is the hymns they sing at Mass and given that we perenially sing post-communion "hymns" talking of "bread and wine" and such tripe, this should come as no surprise.

Until we reinstitute proper catechesis on every level ie hymns, preaching, schools - the list goes on - this level of ignorance will continue to be the norm
29 September 2010 at 10:33
not anonymous but pseudonymous said…
I think Pattif is right; dismissing these results as "irony or sarcasm" may be less disturbing than considering the possibility of catechetical failure, but the latter seems more probable. I have never heard a homily explaining - let alone defending - Catholic doctrine with respect to the Eucharist. If Catholics have understood their Church's teaching, it is only because even the ICEL translations have not succeeded in obscuring the message of the liturgy.

One dreads to think what a similar survey might turn up in terms of use of the confessional, and/or reception of communion in a state of grace. Many Catholics continue to receive despite ignoring the Church's teaching with respect to grave sins.

If ever we needed reminding, here is notice: we must make reparation, and pray for bold pastors.
29 September 2010 at 23:42
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So Now That We're All Saying What We're Thinking...

Image
Over the years on this blog I have offered some commentary on Pope Francis and his bizarre, scandalous and increasingly diabolical pontificate. Of late, I have tried to keep it light, trying to offer some comic relief on the papacy arranged meticulously in a conference room in Hell. Later still, I stopped blogging, mostly due to time constraints, domestic and work commitments. Before I stopped blogging, I was confident enough in my own limited knowledge of the Church to offer some insights into what I thought had gone wrong in the time since 13 March 2013.

Reasons for the catastrophe I offered over the time were varied, from the election of a 'mad Pope' to the election of an apostate Bishop to the Papacy, to someone who was elected Pope but who resisted the Truth and simply taught his own beliefs instead. Who hasn't thought, 'Oh, he's a Jesuit, what could anyone expect?' Did I say these things explicitly? Some yes, others I expect not, because with this situat…
Read more