Are you saying the children from the first picture didn't go to heaven? Why does God (who is omniscient) care whether they singin English or 12th century Latin? Surely he can understand both languages
The liturgy is the liturgy of Heaven, not the liturgy of Earth. The Church's liturgy on Earth reflects Heaven, not the other way round, Jason.
Jason said…
Right, but the same point stands. Can God not understand my English? Why is the liturgy of Heaven performed in a twelfth-century dialect of a dead tongue? what was it performed in before medieval Latin developed as a language? did they just not bother? God can hear us whether we flatter our own pride with Latin or not
The first photograph looks like they are worshipping themselves, all that 60's stuff was cool at the time, but now it is really naf (as the children say!, they also use another word these days that I thought meant happy!).
So to prevent our Worship of God becoming "naf" we have used languages that are not commonly used; A special form of Latin adapted to the worship of God, Greek, etc.
Now of course we can flatter our own pride by saying God can understand all languages, and then choose a language we like perhaps Klingon or Sindarin, or even an outdated form of English forever stuck with the mindset of the 1960's.
I know that the Catholic Church is the One True Church, founded by Christ and guided by the Holy Ghost. In the Western Church we have mainly worshipped in Latin for over 1500 years.
For the last 40 or so years, some people have thought they are better than all those past Catholics... and as we have seen all it has done is empty our churches. "By their fruits we will know them"
Jason, my answer to why Latin is 'Veterum Sapientia' by Bl John XXIII. This is not a case of 'someone else said so', because he didn't enforce this at all, and given what happened after it was a dead letter. Nonetheless it's a very important letter, and a very interesting letter, and I agree with all of its arguments. So instead of arguing in a combox, or citing the authority of the Church, I shall cite the arguments of Bl John XXIII as if they are my own.
Ironically it's only in Latin on the Vatican website!
You are quite right Jason; we shouldn't do Latin out of pride or the silly notion that God understands Latin better. We should do it out of obedience-using the language which was honoured and called for in numerous Councils of the Church. humility-in trusting that all traditions of the Church have a significance of which we may not be aware of now but has been deeply tested and survived through the centuries. and love- through which the 2 reasons above come naturally.
Mike & Michaela Mason said…
Except the new venacular liturgy with non-chant hymnody was very popular with children and young adults - note the huge rise of the folk mass movement.
And the partakers of the folkmassmovement are now all golden oldies who think:
* it's OK to have a chat before, often during, and after Mass, * put the priest "in his place" i.e. answerable to them, * have "communion services" during the week because the priest isn't there, * are quite comfortable with the fact that their children and grandchildren are "good people but they don't practise the faith"
Over the years on this blog I have offered some commentary on Pope Francis and his bizarre, scandalous and increasingly diabolical pontificate. Of late, I have tried to keep it light, trying to offer some comic relief on the papacy arranged meticulously in a conference room in Hell. Later still, I stopped blogging, mostly due to time constraints, domestic and work commitments. Before I stopped blogging, I was confident enough in my own limited knowledge of the Church to offer some insights into what I thought had gone wrong in the time since 13 March 2013.
Reasons for the catastrophe I offered over the time were varied, from the election of a 'mad Pope' to the election of an apostate Bishop to the Papacy, to someone who was elected Pope but who resisted the Truth and simply taught his own beliefs instead. Who hasn't thought, 'Oh, he's a Jesuit, what could anyone expect?' Did I say these things explicitly? Some yes, others I expect not, because with this situat…
Comments
Interesting how most churches, as buildings, used to point upwards. Modern churches usually point sideways.
Rather telling?
So to prevent our Worship of God becoming "naf" we have used languages that are not commonly used; A special form of Latin adapted to the worship of God, Greek, etc.
Now of course we can flatter our own pride by saying God can understand all languages, and then choose a language we like perhaps Klingon or Sindarin, or even an outdated form of English forever stuck with the mindset of the 1960's.
I know that the Catholic Church is the One True Church, founded by Christ and guided by the Holy Ghost. In the Western Church we have mainly worshipped in Latin for over 1500 years.
For the last 40 or so years, some people have thought they are better than all those past Catholics... and as we have seen all it has done is empty our churches. "By their fruits we will know them"
Ironically it's only in Latin on the Vatican website!
http://www.adoremus.org/VeterumSapientia.html
You are quite right Jason; we shouldn't do Latin out of pride or the silly notion that God understands Latin better. We should do it out of obedience-using the language which was honoured and called for in numerous Councils of the Church.
humility-in trusting that all traditions of the Church have a significance of which we may not be aware of now but has been deeply tested and survived through the centuries.
and love- through which the 2 reasons above come naturally.
And the partakers of the folkmassmovement are now all golden oldies who think:
* it's OK to have a chat before, often during, and after Mass,
* put the priest "in his place" i.e. answerable to them,
* have "communion services" during the week because the priest isn't there,
* are quite comfortable with the fact that their children and grandchildren are "good people but they don't practise the faith"
Do I have to continue for you to get the picture?