Good Porn, Bad Porn


"Hello, Mrs Jones, I'm new to the area. I've just knocked on your door to ask whether I can borrow your child for the day. Oh don't worry, its okay, I've got an enhanced CRB check.Yes, I'm just in the area and wonder whether you'd mind me showing your child some pornography. No, no, don't worry, its nothing 'dodgy'. I just think it would be good to be able to show your child some pornography so that your child is able to distinguish between good porn and bad porn - you know - good porn between loving people of either the same or the opposite sex - and bad porn - which involves more people and an element of violence. Mrs Jones, I can see you are feeling quite negative about this idea. You are looking quite inflamed all of a sudden. I'll come back again another day. But here, take my card and take some time to think about it because a group of experts agree with me that this is a really good idea. It's all in your child's best interests, you know that, don't you, Mrs Jones? Yes, yes, see, Barnados and the NSPCC recommended me. Don't worry, I have been accredited by the experts. Still not interested? Okay, well I'll come back later. You're calling the police? Oh no, Mrs Jones, this is all legal and above board...well...kind of...It really depends what law you look at..."

In order to see the insanity into which this country has descended, read here. Soon, if things go in the direction they are going already, a school-teacher will be able to teach children or show children more or less anything - a-n-y-t-h-i-ng - just as long as it isn't Christianity. Porn? Yes, why not? We need to guide children to the good porn - the non-addictive, loving kind of porn that doesn't objectify men and women, doesn't give viewers a distorted vision of human sexuality and love - a kind of good porn that doesn't. Actually. Even. Exist. The kids want heroin? Okay, okay well let's give them really 'good heroin'! This stuff will sort you right out kids!

"You a teacher with a problem with that? You must be some kind of prejudiced 'bigot' or something! We're only asking you show your class porn as an 'educational experience'! Get over it, bigot!"

Then, after the 'same-sex marriage' bill becomes law, its 'gay porn showtime' ('because two men committing sodomy are two persons in a 'loving marital relationship') in your local school classroom. See, there is 'good' gay porn and 'bad' gay porn and its important the gay kids who need to be 'affirmed' in their 'gay identity' and so know and understand the difference.

"You a parent with a problem with that? You must be some kind of prejudiced 'bigot' or something! We're only showing your kids gay porn! Get over it, hater!"

So, after all this time, Peter Tatchell, Harriet Harman and the 'paedophile rights' crowd get what he and they always wanted - the minds, at the very least, of your children. Astonishing how easily evil can slip under the radar isn't it? Vote UKIP and pray the Rosary. They can be no worse than the bunch of clowns (and Fabian fifth columnists) in Parliament and its time the 'experts' were shown the door as well.

Comments

BJC said…
The next thing we'll see is the LGBT crowd infiltrating Ukip. I notice there's already a LGBT affiliated group. There a clever lot, they can see the way the wind's blowing.
Kristin LA said…
Since history repeats itself I ask when in the past has this virulent strain of madness been inflicted on the populace? I would just like to know how it ends.
BJC said…
Off topic a bit but just read this article by Melanie Phillips on the importance of the traditional family in the rearing of children. Its very Catholic in many ways but I'm sure our Bishops would disapprove because its not pro-left.

Its also very good at pointing the finger at why so many of the left leaning media like the Guardian and BBC seem to hate the traditional family or at least play down its importance.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2319192/Why-Left-hates-families-MELANIE-PHIILLIPS-reveals-selfish-sneers-Guardianistas-Left-actively-fosters--revels--family-breakdown-.html
umblepie said…

An excellent post - your prescient
views ring horribly true. Thanks for your articles, courageous and Catholic.
Laurence 'loving faithful mutually exclusive relationship' is not part of the gay marriage legislation - remember the only 'sexual' grounds for same-sex divorce is heterosexual activity...each partner has a right to do whatever they want sexually with any amount of same-sex individuals.
So technically a school does not necessarily need to be restricted in its promotion of same-sex sexual activity...
Technically one might envision complaints that representing two same sex individuals engaging in faithful exclusive sexual activity is actually homophobic and oppressive in that it's enforcing socio-cultural pseudo-nuclear family stereotypes where legally none need exist.
Technically there might come a time where you might be only allowed to 'educationally portray' same-sex couples providing you have three sets - sexually exclusive, same-sexually indiscriminate and a final set who never meet or communicate outside the few minutes of signing the marriage licence and live entirely separate lives.
Andrew said…
The 'gay rights' lobby has never been anything more than a conduit for the normalization and acceptance of paedophilia. To see the evidence for this one need look no further than Peter Tatchell's arguably criminally culpable letter of 1997, calling for the age of consent to be lowered to legitimize acts of sodomy upon 14 year old boys.

These people are bona fide psychopaths. And they're currently dictating policy to every ruling elite in the Western world.



James said…
Peter Tatchell has never advocated adults having sex with children. He does not support this. He says adults should NOT have sex with children. He has never advocated the abolition of ages of consent. He has said that if young people of similar ages have sex below the age of 16 they should not be prosecuted, providing they both consent and there is no coercion, manipulation or exploitation. Treating these young people as criminals is wrong. They need counselling, not prosecution
Read here:
http://petertatchell.net/lgbt_rights/age_of_consent/Under-age-sex-Statement-of-clarification-by-Peter-Tatchell.htm
Andrew said…
Dear James,

Sadly, Peter Tatchell did advocate for the normalization of child-adult sexual relationships. In a letter to the Guardian newspaper (where else, indeed?) on June 26, 1997, he remarked that:

"The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy....it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful."

Of course, Peter's weasel words in his 'clarification' about not condoning sex involving "coercion, manipulation or damage" is simply a truism. It is that he believes that sex with a 9-year old can constitute anything other than an abuse is what is so frightening.

I'm glad here as well that you linked to Mr Tatchell's own website because, until I read the piece you cited, I didn't realize that Peter had actually been defending pedophilia since at least the 1980s, and on quite a substantial number of occasions to boot.