How Britain Looks After Its Brave Boys

Britain's Brave Boys

Army veterans line up on parade on Brighton's seafront in mid-winter. Is not our veterans' service to this country worthy of better treatment than this? Story courtesy of Henry Law of 'An Outside View'.

'These homeless men sleeping out under the promenade at Brighton are all ex-soldiers of various ages. They have served in places like Northern Ireland, the Falklands, and the Gulf. Once they left the army they found it impossible to settle into civilian life and ended up homeless. They have a drink problem but clean up as best they can afterwards. They are probably "institutionalised".

A significant proportion of homeless men are ex-servicemen. The official attitude seems to be that they are no longer of use and can be discarded. I think the problem is that the sort of accommodation that would be right for them simply does not exist. I get the impression that they would not get on well in, for instance, a bed-sit flat, which is what they would probably get offered, after which they would be forgotten about as a solved case. These men need a structured environment, where ex-servicemen can live in a protected community, under firm direction

What might be done? In the seventeenth century, Chelsea Hospital was founded for just this purpose. Isn't there a need for similar institutions today? I have in mind large houses with 15 to 20 rooms and communal facilities such as a dining room, lounge, games and hobbies rooms, and a gymnasium run by a well-organised retired sergeant type who was kind, sympathetic but firm.

Residents in the kind of establishment I envisage would be expected if possible to help in the running of the establishment by taking turns with household tasks like cooking and cleaning, painting, decorating and household tasks. To judge from the way they conduct themselves, most of them would be well able to do such things as a product of their army training.

In such an environment, some of them at least might be able to give up their alcohol habits and possibly hold down regular work and become valuable members of their local communities.

This is really something that the government should take on as part of a duty of care to those who choose to risk their lives to defend the country, but if it will not, there is a need for a new charitable foundation. It would undoubtedly qualify for Royal patronage and enjoy huge public support.

Come on, you tabloids, speak up for our brave boys after their military usefulness is past.'



Perhaps Prince Harry, who enjoyed his service in Afghanistan would be interested in hearing about how our veterans are treated with such contempt after their service in Her Majesty's Armed Forces.



Perhaps Prince William, who has recently been raising the profile of homeless charity Crisis, would be interested in hearing about the disgusting way in which our servicemen are discarded by Government and society after putting their lives on the line for Queen and country.

Rest assured, these men, who sleep under the subway of Brighton beach will have their story told as soon as possible. It is a national scandal that men who have risked life and limb for the people this country should then be tossed aside like rubbish into the gutter. It says everything you want to know about our 'throw-away' society and, indeed, our throw-away Government. It is highly likely that these men have tried to get accommodation from the Council, but don't have a 'local connection'. Who would have thought that their service in the armed forces would have prepared these brave soldiers, for this? More on this story surely to come...

Comments

Anonymous said…
Some good links to get help for ex-servicemen, who should qualify as in "priority need" for housing if they are vulnerable due to their army service.

NB: A recent change in the law means ex-servicemen can establish a local connection in the area of a local authority where they were based.

http://www.spaces.org.uk/spaces/spaces/default.asp?id=12
Anonymous said…
SI for Priority need here:

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2002/20022051.htm

Priority need for accommodation
2. The descriptions of person specified in the following articles have a priority need for accommodation for the purposes of Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996.

snip

Vulnerability: institutional backgrounds
5. - (1) A person (other than a relevant student) who has reached the age of twenty-one and who is vulnerable as a result of having been looked after, accommodated or fostered.

(2) A person who is vulnerable as a result of having been a member of Her Majesty's regular naval, military or air forces.

from:

2002 No. 2051

HOUSING, ENGLAND

The Homelessness (Priority Need for Accommodation) (England) Order 2002

Made 30th July 2002
Coming into force 31st July 2002

---

Hope this is of use when dealing with the Local Authority -- it is clear the "intention" of Parliament when this Statutory Instrument extended the class of those who were in priority need to ex-servicemen vulnerable due to their service in HM Armed Forces was to ensure no ex-serviceman ended up rough sleeping.

I hope the guys you are helping are getting formal written decisions from the Local Authority. They cannot challenge verbal refusals of support or decisions about local connection. Don't let the Local Authority get away with refusing to issue decision letters.

Good luck,

Bryan
Physiocrat said…
I think the problem is that the sort of accommodation that would be right for them simply does not exist.

I get the impression that they would not get on well in, for instance, a bed-sit flat, which is what they would probably get offered, after which they would be forgotten about as a solved case.

What might be right is a large house with 15 to 20 rooms and communal facilities such as a dining room, lounge, games room and hobbies room, run by a well-organised retired sergeant type who was kind, sympathetic but firm.

These men need a structured environment. Residents in the kind of establishment I envisage would be expected if possible to help in the running of the establishment by taking turns with household tasks like cooking and cleaning. To judge from the way the conduct themselves, most of them would be well able to do such things as a product of their army training.
Anonymous said…
Laurence,

Were the links I mentioned above of any use for you? And have there been any developments?

I see you respond to comments about homosexuals but not on homelessness.

Good wishes,

Bryan
Anonymous said…
please delete this test string! test string
[url=http://test.com]test string[/url]