Courtesy of Eponymous Flower
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
PLEASE NOTE:THE POPE FRANCIS LITTLE BOOK OF INSULTS CAN NOW BE READ AT ITS OWN WEBSITE, click link below: THE POPE FRANCIS LI... -
How is your reply to the survey coming along? I have answered two questions and am nearly ready to hand in the towel. It's s...
-
Over the years on this blog I have offered some commentary on Pope Francis and his bizarre, scandalous and increasingly diabolical pontif...
11 comments:
STOP PRESS: Mueller confirms SSPX are in, de facto, schism.
Nailed it.
Phillip
That's a sign of the times, but its not news that the SSPX are in, de facto, schism.
I would like to add "post-conciliar" to Jesuit.
Otherwise it´s offending St. Ignatius, St. Petrus Canisius, St. Francis Xavier and all the other holy Jesuits.
I am quite sure these great Saints are fully aware of the problems besetting their once exemplary Order.
You are right, they are fully aware but most of the contemporary Catholics aren´t.
You're right it's not new news that the SSPX are in, de facto, schism particularly as it's a simple statement of the current reality. It's good seeing Muller say it boldly again because it needs repeating. A lot of 'traditionalists' do not accept this fact so it's good to hear you admit it!
'de facto' -what does that mean (not real).
p.s. http://www.cfnews.org/page88/files/051719b1c386102f78e4a615712b748e-170.html
Where does he get his ideas from? and why does he say them out loud?
Commies good, SSPX bad! +M invited recently a close friend of his from Argentina active in Socialist circles, and Pope B dislikes him tremendously for various and interesting reasons. It all reads like something out of Simone de Beauvoir's Mandarins.
And LOL on the picture, btw!
Good one. Sad to say, but good one.
'Muller' 'boldly' says many things. the latest disagrees with the 'historic' Church (what does 'historic' mean? (irrelevant)) on the 'meaning' of the Real Presence.
Post a Comment