Thursday 6 September 2012

The Russian Revolution and the Banks that Funded It




Exhaustive but informative mega documentary on the Russian Revolution. Why are we never taught this stuff at school? I mean the stuff about the role of Western banks and masonic societies in getting the whole show on the road? Apparently, Lenin was well in with the Mr Big types at the Grand Orient Masonic Order. Yep, that'll be the same Masonic Order which just congratulated the late Cardinal Martini on a job well done...RIP...










14 comments:

  1. There are two reasons why we were not taught this sort of stuff at school.

    1) Schools are meant to teach subjects founded on sound academic scholarship.

    2) Being a conspiracy-obsessed loony is a bit of a handicap if you want to be a historian.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He seems to have done his research.

    Sorry, forgot that any research that leads you to a different story than the 'Official' one, makes you a loon.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I continue to worried about your attachment to conspiracy theories. Do you have too much time on your hands? Whatever else this obsession is, it isn't healthy and it has nothing to do with the Catholic faith.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I continue to worry that in an age in which the media tells you that:

    ...abortion is a moral right

    ...war is a peacekeeping mission

    ...homosexuality is a moral good

    ...marriage can be changed to be between two men or two women

    ...and that God DOES NOT EXIST

    That's the current story perpetuated by the media.

    That you believe uncritically the history and presentation of events by the same liars whose lies emanate throughout society is evidence of your own naivity.

    Ask yourself this. If the Rockefellers and JP Morgan funded Lenin and the Bolshevik Revolution, would you EVER hear of it in the media?

    No, and why?

    Because the media are in the pockets of the same dynastic families!

    For myself, I find the level of brainwashing that is obvious in your comment highly disturbing, so that if anyone presents evidence that counters the official line, you think that the person watching it is mentally unhinged.

    Absurd!

    ReplyDelete
  5. In answer to your question, I'm not anti-semite.

    I'm anti-Rothschilds and the Rockefellers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. They are part of the 'synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not.'

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm always concerned about people who engage in character assassination rather than mustering up some Christian charity and coming up with substantial arguments...

    ReplyDelete
  8. I'm sorry but your ressponse to my comments is just plain silly. I do not receive what the media or academic historians tell me uncritically. You make so many assumptions about me and what I believe based on three sentences. I do not think you are unhinged. I just worry that you are finding all sorts of esoteric nonsense - the sort of esoterica freemasons are rather keen on - on the internet and on You Tube. From this material you construct a narrative of conspiracy. My concern is that your critical faculties are being stunted by all this junk. I am not commenting on your mental health.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In another era I wonder what you would have made of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion?

    ReplyDelete
  10. You're of course entitled to your opinion.

    Everything has to do with the Catholic Faith.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 'Everything has to do with the Catholic Faith.' Yes....but that doesn't mean your esoteric and eccentric belief in masonic Jewish Bolshevik conspiracy theories is Catholic.

    ReplyDelete
  12. http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/leo_xiii/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_18840420_humanum-genus_en.html

    ReplyDelete
  13. There is no good in publishing comments that ridicule and defame you. If they won't address the alleged facts, assertions and arguments, there is no reason to publish them.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I am familiar with Pope Leo XIII's encyclical on freemasonry. My argument is not with Pope Leo but with you. Pope Leo was a reasonable man and his arguments are measured. I'm afraid you are straying into quite different territory.

    ReplyDelete

'Anonymous' comments will not be displayed. Please use your name or a pseudonym. If you wish to comment then I ask that you maintain a measure of good will. If you are unable to do so, then please go elsewhere.