I wish I was more able to write, but am exhausted at the moment, otherwise I would try writing something based on this...
Here is an excellent link to a psychologist's defence of traditional / natural marriage, based on history and the Code of Hammurabi amongst other things...It is completely secular and quite water-tight.
Interesting... about two hours before the voting closed on this guardian page, the pole was about 70:30 yes:no but when it closed it was roughly 46:53 yes:no! Credible?!
'Anonymous' comments will not be displayed. Please use your name or a pseudonym. If you wish to comment then I ask that you maintain a measure of good will. If you are unable to do so, then please go elsewhere.
I wish I was more able to write, but am exhausted at the moment, otherwise I would try writing something based on this...
ReplyDeleteHere is an excellent link to a psychologist's defence of traditional / natural marriage, based on history and the Code of Hammurabi amongst other things...It is completely secular and quite water-tight.
It is well worth a read!
http://blogs.psychcentral.com/faith/2012/05/same-sex-marriage-not-a-religious-issue/
Interesting... about two hours before the voting closed on this guardian page, the pole was about 70:30 yes:no but when it closed it was roughly 46:53 yes:no! Credible?!
ReplyDeleteShortly before closing the poll showed 69.2% YES against 30.8% NO and yet the published result is quite different.
ReplyDeleteThere was a social media campaign to drum up "No" votes in the last 45mins.
ReplyDeleteDisappointed to see that the Guardian fiddled the poll at the last minute. When I voted the Yes vote was way ahead.
ReplyDelete