tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post3358151037253075605..comments2024-01-08T10:10:48.074+00:00Comments on That The Bones You Have Crushed May Thrill: Teresa May MP Bullied into SubmissionThe Boneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10271719805983763595noreply@blogger.comBlogger25125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-87660449539058223672010-05-24T15:22:44.980+01:002010-05-24T15:22:44.980+01:00I suspect one or two people are all targeting you ...I suspect one or two people are all targeting you with abuse under different aliases, for some reason. I'm extremely sorry that this has happenned to you, and I will remember you and them in your prayers.stopbeingstupidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14860866633957025571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-19403395956806874262010-05-23T19:16:47.697+01:002010-05-23T19:16:47.697+01:00I suppose you don't agree with women wearing t...I suppose you don't agree with women wearing trousers either?<br />I mean, it's just a step too far - why would they demand control over their own bodies?Feminist Catholicnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-9679191433369424962010-05-23T19:13:47.477+01:002010-05-23T19:13:47.477+01:00yes then neither should catholics oppose remaining...yes then neither should catholics oppose remaining discrimination and prejudice against ethnic minorities or women either because they have achieved some level of equal human and civil rights to date. The point is they had to protest and campaign and be politically active to achieve these same rights which they enjoy now. Had they not done so, they would still be in a subserviant secondary position within society. gays are political because being political is necessary.Gay Civil Rights Lawyernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-41926775362779958252010-05-23T18:22:59.171+01:002010-05-23T18:22:59.171+01:00"having children is not a 'right' sin..."having children is not a 'right' since the best interests of the child are paramount."<br /><br />Since rights imply duties, and we do not have the right to have children, should we conclude that we do not have the duty to have children either? That would bugger up a lot of church teaching wouldn't it <br /><br />I suppose now you are aligning yourself with some eugenic restrictive-breeding programme? Or are you just clutching at straws again to justify your own burning gay self-denial, you self-obsessed hysterical queen. <br /><br />You say repeatedly that gays demand attention and self-validation by wearing the sash, but surely your own pathetic arguments are just an attempt to get some attention for your own mental crusade. I bet you don't even believe in God do you? You tried being gay, didn't get enough attention, and now you see an opportunity to court controversy. Get over yourself sweetheart, you really aren't that importantAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-88272472810669892852010-05-23T15:26:02.582+01:002010-05-23T15:26:02.582+01:00I've made a error too, ooops!
the conservativ...I've made a error too, ooops!<br /><br />the conservative party needed to change it's public image as 'the nasty party'... not it's public issue.Teresa May blows in the windnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-62645049152371177642010-05-23T15:23:09.329+01:002010-05-23T15:23:09.329+01:00*CORRECTION*
JP I was parton of a catholic adoptio...*CORRECTION*<br />JP I was parton of a catholic adoption agency (not a gay adoption agency).<br />Apologies for the typo!catholic truth societynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-25808896597899914272010-05-23T15:18:53.608+01:002010-05-23T15:18:53.608+01:00Actually Teresa May is on record before the electi...Actually Teresa May is on record before the election (and therefore also the Question Time programme) as having changed her opinion on these matters. It wasn't because of gay lobbying, it was because the conservatives realised they would never be elected unless they changed their public issue as the 'nasty party'. <br /><br />Considering her poor voting record on matters of equality, the 'gay lobby' had every right to press for an indication that she will not change her opinions again in the future if it was politically convenient.Teresa May blows in the windnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-18859831006694776382010-05-23T15:11:20.180+01:002010-05-23T15:11:20.180+01:00Pope JP I refused to speak publically against the ...Pope JP I refused to speak publically against the italian government at the time's intention to legislate in terms of gay adoption. As a cardinal he was patron of a gay adoption society who's practice was often to place children with disabilities and complex needs with single gay people. He said they would never be able to place such children if the proposed law went through, and gay people proved to be very loving and caring parents to these children.catholic truth societynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-69596452450650197662010-05-23T15:04:32.166+01:002010-05-23T15:04:32.166+01:00''Above all, like being a Priest is not a ...''Above all, like being a Priest is not a right but a vocation, having children is not a 'right' since the best interests of the child are paramount. They are not served by being placed with a 'gay couple'.''<br /><br />Gay people have always had children for varying reasons eg from a previous relationship/marriage, via artificial insemination with another, because they are have assumed parenting responsibility following the death of a family member etc.<br />Gay people have always been able to adopt (as a single person, whether or not they were in a relationship) and have often taken the most difficult to adopt children with complex needs. All that has changed is that the gay people in a relationship can now adopt as a couple.New Social Ordernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-9276428676448764982010-05-23T14:53:20.327+01:002010-05-23T14:53:20.327+01:00"16 year old children can be easily groomed b..."16 year old children can be easily groomed by catholic clergy who do not have their best interests at heart and who want them only for their own sexual satisfaction."<br /><br />So maybe we should deny human and civil rights to members of the clergy or the institutional church based on the same fallacious arguments?Canon lawyernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-23511776762850954902010-05-23T14:47:37.400+01:002010-05-23T14:47:37.400+01:00''16 year old children can be easily groom...''16 year old children can be easily groomed by heterosexuals who do not have their best interests at heart and who want them only for their own sexual satisfaction.''<br /><br />So maybe we should deny human and civil rights to heterosexuals based on the same fallacious arguments?Address the imbalancenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-65005211803196770922010-05-23T14:41:59.276+01:002010-05-23T14:41:59.276+01:00The incidence of paedophilia is not greater among ...The incidence of paedophilia is not greater among the gay community - all of the research suggest such arguements to be unfounded.Social Scientistnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-31401850801492703542010-05-23T14:38:04.928+01:002010-05-23T14:38:04.928+01:00The reason the 'gay lobby' is millitant is...The reason the 'gay lobby' is millitant is because society has not been compasssionate and patient but rather preferred to fingerpoint and steroetype. <br />It wasn't very long ago that gay people could be sacked from their jobs, kicked out of their homes and were subject to violence. <br /><br />These instances of 'unjust discrimination' (as the cathecism calls them) are why the gay lobby are millitant and will remain so until they are accorded respect and equality in terms of civil rights and benefits.Gay Millitant Strikes Backnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-12546624709258275742010-05-23T14:25:08.151+01:002010-05-23T14:25:08.151+01:00I'm spent some time on the straight club scene...I'm spent some time on the straight club scene in my time - it is a highly charged, highly sexualised culture. <br /><br />Older men do pay a great deal of interest in the 'fresh' younger females who come into the bars. Young, vulnerable females who walk into straight bars/clubs aren't treated like young, vulnerable females but are largely pounced on because they're attractive.Laurence is a Gaynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-66312064405855525302010-05-23T08:38:00.787+01:002010-05-23T08:38:00.787+01:00I can understand why it would be wrong to place a ...I can understand why it would be wrong to place a child with a gay couple, this I understand. But to say that by doing so that couple or homosexual individual is going to groom the 16 year old child, I think is a different accusation, one which is to do with pedophilia and ephebophilia. Admittedly, if the person is homosexual then there is going to be evidence of that in their crimes, but it is the pedophilia part which is to be looked at and not the sexual orientation. <br /><br />I disagree with the other annonymous in that I don't think sexual orientation is a choice in that one freely chooses it, but that is far from saying i think someone is born gay which I don't agree with. I think the topic is not as easy as anybody wants and whereas before I used to be pretty tough in my views of homosexuality, I think the topic is far more complicated and needs compassion and patience rather than finger pointing. However I know this is difficult when we have a militant gay lobby 'coming out'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-76404399877732471312010-05-23T08:13:03.314+01:002010-05-23T08:13:03.314+01:00Of course all homosexuals do not do that. But, I b...Of course all homosexuals do not do that. But, I bet that some do. <br /><br />I'm spent some time on the gay scene in my time - it is a highly charged, highly sexualised culture. <br /><br />Older men do pay a great deal of interest in the 'fresh' younger men who come into the bars. Young, vulnerable men who walk into gay bars aren't treated like young, vulnerable men but are largely pounced on because they're attractive.<br /><br />Above all, like being a Priest is not a right but a vocation, having children is not a 'right' since the best interests of the child are paramount. They are not served by being placed with a 'gay couple'.<br /><br />The very least we can do for the child is to provide a mother and a father.The Boneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10271719805983763595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-72321036234626366482010-05-23T01:56:32.417+01:002010-05-23T01:56:32.417+01:00this article is quite frankly disgusting and highl...this article is quite frankly disgusting and highly ironic when you take into account that it's written by a catholic seeing as the faith is rife with sexual indecency - homosexuals do not 'groom' people for their own advantage, sexual orientation is a choice and should not be judged by narrow minded blog writers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-84427522528981637212010-05-22T22:50:23.279+01:002010-05-22T22:50:23.279+01:00I saw that Question Time programme and it was quit...I saw that Question Time programme and it was quite clear that Teresa May was running scared of these people.Is it, I wonder, because so many of them went to Public Schools that they now appear to dominate the media?Patriciushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08906131174326742939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-54296763961208314952010-05-22T21:47:33.826+01:002010-05-22T21:47:33.826+01:00Gay adoption is going to create a market for child...Gay adoption is going to create a market for children. And when that happens we'll see children removed from good, religious homes that are now deemed "abusive" ~ and put into the care of homosexuals that can't make their own kids.Michelle Theresehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16185810008704682978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-41315303945452421512010-05-22T20:45:11.507+01:002010-05-22T20:45:11.507+01:00There's also a pro-Theresa May facebook page.
...There's also a pro-Theresa May facebook page.<br /><br />http://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/group.php?gid=121006464588900&ref=tsstopbeingstupidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14860866633957025571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-83172874785326807652010-05-22T16:16:48.902+01:002010-05-22T16:16:48.902+01:00Can't heterosexuals groom young children too? ...Can't heterosexuals groom young children too? And doesn't the act of grooming a child make you a paedophile by definition?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-69810278584119942082010-05-22T14:29:53.355+01:002010-05-22T14:29:53.355+01:00Laurence has it spot on. Its like the big elephant...Laurence has it spot on. Its like the big elephant in the room that no one wants to acknowledge.Aduliohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00534730218402742905noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-70787845537998350392010-05-22T11:19:54.276+01:002010-05-22T11:19:54.276+01:00If you want evidence of this, as I said, look at t...If you want evidence of this, as I said, look at the sex abuse crisis in the US.The Boneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10271719805983763595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-50725901017465577212010-05-22T11:16:22.230+01:002010-05-22T11:16:22.230+01:00No, I mean homosexuals can groom the young for the...No, I mean homosexuals can groom the young for their own ends.The Boneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10271719805983763595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-41747360459698122782010-05-22T11:05:01.447+01:002010-05-22T11:05:01.447+01:00"16 year old children can be easily groomed b..."16 year old children can be easily groomed by homosexuals who do not have their best interests at heart and who want them only for their own sexual satisfaction."<br /><br />I hope you mean Pedophiles.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com