"Christians! Be quiet!" says Lynne Featherstone: But For Whom is She Really Working?
|...as long as you agree with us, that is...|
The Telegraph reports that, once again, Featherstone has asked Church leaders 'not to polarise debate' on gay marriage.
This is, again, a piece of curious doublespeak on the reality of public debate. What Featherstone of course really means is, 'don't disagree with us', since it appears that to take the opposite view to that taken by Britain's political elite is to be wholly unreasonable and deeply unpleasant to those in favour of 'gay marriage'. By vocally disagreeing with same-sex marriage, you are guilty of 'fanning the flames of homophobia'. Basically, if you disagree with the redefinition of marriage to include two people of the same-sex, you're committing a 'hate crime', even if your arguments against redefining marriage are grounded in reason, rather than prejudice against the homosexual community.
According to The Telegraph, Featherstone, apparently, 'gave a "cast iron guarantee" that civil gay marriages would be law by the next general election despite the strength of opposition from church leaders.' But I am really beginning to wonder just who is she giving that "cast-iron guarantee" to? Is it to those 'on the ground' or those 'above' her? What is becoming more apparent in the whole 'gay marriage' debate is the unswerving support given to this project for social engineering by those in political power, despite the fact that, as David Burrowes, Conservative MP for Enfield Southgate, has said, there is no tangible public groundswell of support for the law to be changed.
Perhaps we are all a little guilty of naivety over the 'gay rights' movement. Who, after all, is funding the LGBT movement in the United Kingdom? Who is funding the LGBT movement in the USA and Europe? I ask this because, let's be frank, the LGBT political agitation phenomena appears to be a movement that is near global. The fact that it is a global strategy for social change should make us wonder whether those behind the drive for gay marriage are, in fact, globalists. So, lets do some digging and find out exactly whether our beloved Government are genuinely afraid of upsetting the 'gay rights activists' themselves, or whether, in fact, they are genuinely afraid of upsetting those who fund the gay rights movement.
So who is funding the LGBT Movement?
The website, LGBTQ Funders, gives us some information about who is funding the movement both in the UK and elsewhere. The Board of Directors listed on the LGBTQ Funders site reveals some interesting names in global philanthropy which are driving the LGBT campaign forward in the US, the UK and Europe and, yes, across the whole World. This LGBTQ Funders report states that, 'In this, our 9th year of mapping the amount and character of such grantmaking, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer Grantmaking by US Foundations (2010) reveals that support for LGBTQ communities increased from $93.5 million to $97.2 million, an increase of 3.9 percent from 2009'. Here are a few of the names of large backers, many of whom are on the Board of Directors:
Of course, the name that leaps out of the pack is the Rockerfeller Philanthropy Advisers group. So let's start with them. The Rockerfeller Foundation has, historically, been major funders for some of the most culturally seismic changes in Western society, including the women's liberation and the movement for the legalisation of abortion, as well as continuing to fund various projects in Africa and beyond aimed at depopulation of the continent and, indeed, every continent on Earth. It was the Rockerfeller dynasty that started the Population Council.
In fact, in 2009, I blogged about a C-Fam report on a meeting of the World's billionaires in New York in order to discuss 'global population issues'. Attending the conference were such leading philanthropic investment bankers as George Soros, David Rockerfeller, Bill Gates, Ted Turner, Warren Buffett and Michael Bloomberg. And, let us make no mistake, 'gay marriage' and the gay rights movement is most definitely a population issue, since, as we all know, neither homosexuals nor lesbians can procreate and bring forth children.
The Rockerfeller Foundation, along with the Ford Foundation, the Buffett Foundation and the Playboy Foundation also, as a footnote, fund Catholics for Choice, the openly dissenting organisation campaigning for the Church to accept abortion and artificial contraception. Oh, and the Rockerfeller Foundation also funded various eugenic programmes in Germany, including Dr Josef Mengele's before he went into Auschwitz. So, we know we are dealing with nice philanthropists with hearts of gold, here.
'Kinsey Report' of 1948, which, according to US website Prison Planet, laid the foundation for the moral and cultural collase we see today...
'Sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation, Kinsey's goal was "to supplant what he saw as a narrow procreational Judeo Christian era with a promiscuous "anything goes" bi/gay pedophile paradise." (Reisman, Crafting Gay Children: An Inquiry, p.4) He cruised Times Square looking for subjects. More than 25% of his sample were prostitutes and prison inmates including many sex offenders. Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with impotence and self-mutilation (orchitis, Reisman p. 278), said 10 per cent of American men were gay when in fact only two per cent were.'
The reason the Kinsey Reports have been said to have laid the groundwork for moral collapse in the Western world is because apart from offering distorted and exaggerated 'scientific' views of human sexuality and orientation, the chief achievement of the reports was to separate sex from procreation. He founded the Kinsey Institute for Sex, Gender and Reproduction. In other words, it was the Rockerfeller Foundation that helped to lay the groundwork not just for moral collapse in the West, but also to disassociate sex from reproduction and to help to break down sexual taboos in Western societies.
The Arcus Foundation is a private foundation founded in the United States which, bizarrely, proclaims that its mission is "to achieve social justice that is inclusive of sexual orientation, gender identity and race, and to ensure conservation and respect of the great apes." Its owner and director is one Jon Stryker, a billionaire philanthropist (the 428th richest man in the World, to be precise) who has, from Kalamazoo, stretched out his generous hand to LGBT organisations in both the United States and the United Kingdom. Arcus now have offices in, all of places, Cambridge, England. In 2010, the Arcus Foundation, alone, made grants of $16,234,896 to LGBT organisations around the World.
According to Wikipedia, The Foundation Center is a 'nonprofit organization headquartered in New York City. The Center’s stated mission is "to strengthen the social sector by advancing knowledge about philanthropy in the U.S. and around the world." The Center maintains comprehensive databases on grantmakers and their grants; issues a wide variety of print, electronic, and online information resources; conducts and publishes research on trends in foundation growth, giving, and practice; and offers education and training programs online and at its five regional library/learning centers and global network of more than 450 funding information centers known as Cooperating Collections. The president of the organization is Bradford K. Smith.' According to the LGBTQ Funders document, 40 Years of LGBTQ Philanthropy, The Ford Foundation has, from 1970 - 1910 showered LGBT organisations with $46,123,135.
I shall not go on. I think you get the gist. The fact that the Rockerfellers among other billionnaires are funding the worldwide campaign for 'gay rights' and 'gay marriage' should have enough people up on their seats wondering exactly for whom the Government works. Is it the citizens of the United Kingdom? Or, is it the case that, as has been true in recent memory, the Government do the bidding of very well-funded lobby groups, not just because of the propaganda which emanates through the Press on its behalf, nor merely because they are well-formed, established and militant pressure groups, but because the financial backers, many of whom form part of an international banking dynasty, fund these pressure groups and these men are, in fact, some of the richest and most powerful men on Earth?
Why? Because they don't work for you or me. They work on behalf of the rich and powerful of this World with an agenda which is divorced from any notion of the common good of society which has been hitherto understood as sensible. The gay marriage issue is not an issue of 'rights' for homosexuals and lesbians. It is, first and fundamentally, a population issue driven by an unelected powerful elite. Secondarily, it is an exercise in ensuring that parents are no longer the primary moral educators of their children, but the State. Thirdly, it is an exercise in cornering the Church and anyone else who believes in traditional marriage into a situation in which liberty and freedom of speech itself will come under increased and sustained attack from the State's thought police. Fourthly, it is an exercise in elective dictatorship in which the State is the new conscience of the nation and, more importantly arbiter and giver of rights. Fifthly and most importantly, it is about destroying the family, natural bonds of society and in deepening the relationship between the individual and the State.
Within the time it has taken to write this blogpost, Lynne Featherstone has confirmed that whether you protest against same-sex marriage by letter, phone, email, fax or guitar, this 'consultation' phase of introducing 'gay marriage' is an exercise in cosmetic democracy. The fact that dysfunctional 'three parent families', which are surely deeply distressting to children, are already in our courts means nothing to the Government. As I said, they're going to do it anyway. Colin Hart of the Coalition for Marriage has said, "I always thought that a consultation was about listening to people and asking them their views, before making a decision. Not only are they redefining the meaning of marriage, they're redefining the meaning of consultation." Welcome to 1984, Colin. Welcome to the Brave New World. This 'consultation' is fast beginning to remind me of a Russian election.
If you want to know just how dangerous the Rockerfeller dynasty and its stranglehold over national Governments is to human freedom, I suggest you watch this interview with US film-maker Aaron Russo, now, sadly, deceased. "He who controls the money supply, controls the nation". That, I expect, is the reality that we and even David Cameron and Lynne Featherstone now face. The French Revolution was not orchestrated by the masses, but by a vanguard of elite spokespersons who acted on their behalf. The Russian Revolution was not orchestrated by the masses, but by a vanguard of elite spokespersons who acted on their behalf. This revolution, the revolution in Marriage, is not being orchestrated by the masses, but by a vanguard of the elite who have employed others to speak on our behalf because our voice is not welcome.