tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post2810308473318177348..comments2024-01-08T10:10:48.074+00:00Comments on That The Bones You Have Crushed May Thrill: Men of Faith, Men of ScienceThe Boneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10271719805983763595noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-48632360700316234642012-12-02T16:33:07.378+00:002012-12-02T16:33:07.378+00:00The Miracle of Lanciano is approved by the Vatican...The Miracle of Lanciano is approved by the Vatican, sweety.<br /><br />My interpretation of transubstantiation is not screwy.<br /><br />The Boneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10271719805983763595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-11991812126759370642012-12-02T16:28:46.220+00:002012-12-02T16:28:46.220+00:00Well if that's true then you must submit that ...Well if that's true then you must submit that there could, in principle, be scientific proof of the transubstantiation. If the atoms of bread literally transform into those of meat then it ought to be demonstrable. The fact that it never has, or never will be demonstrated sort of suggests your interpretation of the doctrine is screwy. Have a little look at your encyclicals love then come back to the faith when you understand it. I won't report you to Leveson this time but let's be honest, an unregulated mess of heretical opinions only risks losing souls to Hell, that's why we do in fact have a system of regulation, it's called the Magisterium. Have a little read of its doctrines sweetheart then pop back when you're ready to stop leading souls away with heresyJohnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-48328752496749662832012-12-01T14:20:48.221+00:002012-12-01T14:20:48.221+00:00Like I said, check out Lanciano.
http://www.there...Like I said, check out Lanciano.<br /><br />http://www.therealpresence.org/eucharst/mir/lanciano.htmlThe Boneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10271719805983763595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-68424140728380146162012-12-01T14:06:30.697+00:002012-12-01T14:06:30.697+00:00I think you are wrong.
It is the Body and Blood o...I think you are wrong.<br /><br />It is the Body and Blood of the Lord.<br /><br />It is not changed in 'theological meaning'. We do not receive 'theological meaning' but the Body and Blood of the Lord.<br /><br />Second, while the accidents of bread and wine remain, the substance has changed.<br /><br />That's why it is called Transubstantiation.The Boneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10271719805983763595noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-53726864189386919602012-12-01T13:31:47.099+00:002012-12-01T13:31:47.099+00:00You seem to equate consubstantiation to the molecu...You seem to equate consubstantiation to the molecular change of water turning to ice or steam which a change in the physical nature of the accidents. however, the eucharist is a change in the sacramental meaning (or theological substance) of the bread and wine into the body and blood of our lord. therefore the molecular substance (ie physical properties) of the bread/wine remain unaltered. the former can be believed because of scientific proof, the latter can not since it is a matter of religious conviction or faith only. <br /><br />you're comparing apples n pears.Andrew Rexnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2389530333077823143.post-53605127835910819672012-12-01T11:07:03.973+00:002012-12-01T11:07:03.973+00:00I have been reading your blog for a long time, you...I have been reading your blog for a long time, you are one of the very few people in the UK who "gets it"- I think you would like the blog http://onecosmos.blogspot.co.uk/ The discussions there are sort of the intersection of Religion, conservative politics, philosophy and Psychology. FOFOhttp://www.ebay.comnoreply@blogger.com