Since When Was Violent Uprising Morally Okay?


London, 2011


Ukraine, 2014

Remember protesters, if you rare planning to violently revolt, there are things you can do in Kiev that you cannot do in London. If you violently revolt in Kiev, the British Government, the CIA and the Western mass media are basically on your side. Just don't try this at home, kids. 

Pray for Ukraine.

And if you are British and really want 'regime change'...well, it will happen one day.

Comments

nicholas dyson said…
Coup d'etat orchestrated by EU?
23 February 2014 at 21:11
Lepanto said…
The London rioters weren't seeking regime change, mainly they were seeking free trainers and jeans. When we have a petty Putin here, we will know and fight, I hope.
23 February 2014 at 22:38
Independent said…
Violent uprising in Germany in the mid-thirties would have been illegal
under the terms of the Enabling Act, for which the Catholic Centre Party voted, but it would have been morally justified.
24 February 2014 at 10:57
Andrew said…
"Violent uprising in Germany in the mid-thirties would have been illegal under the terms of the Enabling Act, for which the Catholic Centre Party voted, but it would have been morally justified."

(sarcasm)See, Hitler's Germany was all the fault of those evil catholics.(/sarcasm)
25 February 2014 at 20:48
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

So Now That We're All Saying What We're Thinking...

Image
Over the years on this blog I have offered some commentary on Pope Francis and his bizarre, scandalous and increasingly diabolical pontificate. Of late, I have tried to keep it light, trying to offer some comic relief on the papacy arranged meticulously in a conference room in Hell. Later still, I stopped blogging, mostly due to time constraints, domestic and work commitments. Before I stopped blogging, I was confident enough in my own limited knowledge of the Church to offer some insights into what I thought had gone wrong in the time since 13 March 2013.

Reasons for the catastrophe I offered over the time were varied, from the election of a 'mad Pope' to the election of an apostate Bishop to the Papacy, to someone who was elected Pope but who resisted the Truth and simply taught his own beliefs instead. Who hasn't thought, 'Oh, he's a Jesuit, what could anyone expect?' Did I say these things explicitly? Some yes, others I expect not, because with this situat…
Read more