Mahony and Francis



On January 16th 2014, Pope Francis received Cardinal Roger Mahony and concelebrated Mass with him. CWN reports that it was in his homily for this Mass, that Pope Francis lamented the Church's abuse of the innocent and vulnerable. Said His Holiness...

“But are we ashamed? So many scandals that I do not wish to mention individually, but we all know about them. We know where they are! Some scandals have been very costly. Okay...” At this point, Pope Francis spoke bluntly about the “shame of the Church” over those scandals that echo as so many “defeats of priests, bishops and laity.”  

Yikes! But what about Cardinals, Your Holiness? Harsh words indeed and a Cardinal implicated in a deeply unsavoury cover up of priestly abuse was in the room - that is - the Church when His Holiness said it! Is this Pontiff insensitive or unafraid to read the riot act to those who have reason to be unpopular within the Church because of scandal?

The problem, the Pope continued, is that “the word of God was rare in those scandals. In those men, in those women, the word of God was rare. They did not have a bond with God. They had a position in the Church, a position of power as well as comfort” but not “the word of God.” The Pontiff added: “It is pointless to say “but I wear a medal, I wear a cross: yes, like those who carried the ark without a living relationship with God and with the word of God!” Then, recalling Jesus' words regarding scandals, the Pope repeated that scandals bring about “the decay of the people of God, to the point of weakness and the corruption of priests.” 

Readers, I'm a sinner, as you know, seeking the mercy of God, but if I were Cardinal Roger Mahony, listening to that I'd feel a little uncomfortable. Questions still remain perhaps over whether the Pope chose to fit his homily around his co-celebrant or whether His Holiness forgot the history of the individual concelebrating and that's arguably not ours to know. Nevertheless, you can read Cardinal Roger Mahony's account of 'My Lovely Day with Pope Francis' here in which he details the discussions he had with Pope Francis about immigration and some other matters of social justice. Your Holiness, if you want to know how to run a Diocese, or even the Church into the ground, just keep talking to this prelate. He'll tell you all you need to know.

Cardinal Mahoney's reputation for being 'not particularly effective' at dealing with the horrific child sexual abuse (read: rape) committed by priests in his Diocese goes before him, so much so, in fact, that when news that His Eminence was to vote at the papal conclave, there were actual protests in LA about it. This can be seen here.

It is astonishing, given the appalling nature of the abuse that was well and truly covered up, first by Cardinal Law (who was kicked out of his own church by Francis on the new Pope's first day in the role) and then allegedly by Mahony in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, as well as the damage done to the Church in terms of moral standing and financial 'pay-outs', that Mahony is able to continue blogging as a retiring Cardinal-cum-Archbishop Emeritus exercising full freedom in his ministry with zero public censure from Rome.  There is, as yet, no formal censure, no formal reproach or indeed any demand by the Chief Shepherd or the CDF for a spirit or habit of repentance to be adopted by the individual whose record is publicly, and objectively and rightly so, in disgrace, though, naturally 'who am I to judge?'

Invited, however, the Cardinal was to vote at the conclave, to the bemusement of the many and joy of very, very few. The news report records how...

“Without my even having to inquire, the nuncio in Washington phoned me a week or so ago and said, ‘I have had word from the highest folks in the Vatican: You are to come to Rome and you are to participate in the conclave,’” Mahony told the news service.

So the 'highest folks in the Vatican' (according to Mahony) called him up to help pick the man who will clean up the Vatican good and proper, despite the public scandal of his presence there? "We need a Pope to clean out the augean stables at the Vatican. Let's invite Mahony to the party to help us pick the man! His track record is second to none!"

I guess those were the days when the Vatican didn't do PR very well. That will be the days before they didn't lay out millions to gigantic corporations to improve 'communication' or consulting firms that publicly support 'same-sex marriage' etc. Indeed, at the time, discomfort with Mahony being invited to vote in the conclave due to His Eminence's woeful track record in terms of the sheer scale of the cover up in his Archdiocese of priestly abusers made it onto the blogs with some commentators suggesting, 'This is a bit of a joke, right?' But it wasn't a joke. It was for real.

Inappropriate it was, perhaps, but, indeed, Cardinal Mahoney was jubilant with the election of Pope Francis and made his feelings clear, with an unnecessarily barbed set of Twitter comments towards Benedict XVI on his social network account, suggesting that under Pope Francis we'd see 'Jesus without trappings' (unlike with the last guy who, you know, actually knelt at the Consecration and knelt before Jesus during Exposition of the Blessed Sacrament).


'Oh how I wish for a poor Church for the poor.' Well, after the litigation and payouts for victims of abuse covered up in the Archdiocese of Washington, he would say that. What a charming individual! 'So long, Papal ermine and fancy lace!' In other words, 'So long, Papa Benedict! It was nice knowing you...have left!' 'New Pentecost?' Good grief! Talk about hyperbole!

This was, unsurprisingly enough, to see Rorate Caeli, National Catholic Register and other commentators react angrily to a retired Cardinal whose lack of diligence and abnegation of duty saw his Diocese bleed $10million to victims of abuse while he was at the conclave suggesting that now the reign of Benedict XVI was over he was glad to ring in the arrival of someone who was new, more humble and refreshingly so. What cheek!

I am not saying, this Cardinal (Archbishop Emeritus) is an ecclesiastical leper and shouldn't be touched by any Pope with a bargepole. Of course, all Cardinals are human and prone to mistakes. I am, however, a little confused that Pope Francis should be so hot on Church 'scandal' on the day that Mahony steps in to concelebrate Mass with him in Rome and for the same Cardinal to be so effusive concerning his 'lovely day with Pope Francis'.

Are we meant to believe that Cardinal Mahony had esteem for Benedict XVI?
He's obviously in love with His Holiness Pope Francis even though, objectively speaking, he just publicly received rebuke from Francis on the Church and scandal during Mass, whether Francis meant to do so or not.

All I'm saying is, that its all more than just a bit weird that His Holiness should concelebrate a Mass with this individual and invite him in for a cosy chat when this person has dragged not only the name of Holy Mother Church through the mud, but presided over the Diocesan cover up of some of the most reprehensible crimes against the young committed by clerics in living memory.

Whatever it is that the Franciscans of the Immaculate have done, or indeed not done, it pales in comparison to the public scandal that is Cardinal Roger Mahony. Go figure! For the time being, Pope Francis remains an enigma. Maybe there are things said between Pontiff and Archbishop Emeritus privately that remain private and that's how it should be, or maybe this is an occasion on which the Successor of St Peter decided that it was not his place to judge. If only such mercy were accorded to the blameless. As it turns out, the maligned and despised Pontiff, Benedict XVI, saw to the defrocking of nearly 400 priests in two years for sexual abuse. How many did you defrock, Your Eminence, Cardinal Roger Mahony?

Comments

Lynda said…
What a diabolical farce!
Joe Potillor said…
I was born in his archdiocese, so I know all too well the reign of terror caused by Cardinal Mahony...and his archdiocese was Los Angeles, not Washington DC.

Abp Gomez (the present ordinary) in the archdiocese did attempt to suppress him, but this stopped under the election of Pope Francis. Because Cardinal Mahony outranks Abp Gomez, he couldn't do a full suppression even if he wanted to. (Cardinals of the Church can pretty much say Mass anywhere)....

The problem is I know Mahony was serious about those tweets between the absolute liturgical disaster his archdiocese was (plain vestments, pouring of Jesus after the consecration)...absolutely no beauty whatsoever...and the hideous cathedral to top it off)...it was by no means hyperbole for him...He had a disdain for Pope Benedict XVI

Genty said…
According to Mahony the BoR ended his homily with these words:

"Awaken! Why do you sleep, Lord? Let this be our prayer! Awaken! Do not reject us forever! Why do you hide your face? Why do you forget our affliction and oppression? We ask the Lord never to forget the Word of God, which is alive, so that it enters into our hearts and to never forget the holy people faithful to God who ask us to nourish and strengthen them."

Eh?
kfca said…
While reading this, I was thinking of the very short shrift that +Bernard Cardinal Law received from Pope Francis Bergoglio, "the pope of kindness", when seemingly summarily dispatched from St. Maria Maggiore in the earliest days of his pontificate.

BTW Joe, I disagree that ++Archbishop Gomez is 'outranked' by +Roger Cardinal Mahoney. The latter does have certain privileges, but Archbishop Gomez is the Metropolitan; he wears the pallium, and therefore has enormous graces of state; the duty of the care of souls is his alone.
viterbo said…
zac.11.17 O shepherd, and idol, that forsaketh the flock: the sword upon his arm and upon his right eye: his arm shall quite wither away, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened.



Anonymous said…
The other part of this is that this concelebration and meeting occurred on the same day that the representative from the Vatican was defending the Church's record on sexual abuse before an international body. The same day.
Nicholas Dyson said…
Shows that at times the church lets the double standards of the world in.Pope Paul v1 called it the smoke of satan.
Hughie said…
"“Without my even having to inquire, the nuncio in Washington phoned me a week or so ago and said, ‘I have had word from the highest folks in the Vatican: You are to come to Rome and you are to participate in the conclave,’” Mahony told the news service.

"So the 'highest folks in the Vatican' (according to Mahony) called him up to help pick the man who will clean up the Vatican good and proper, despite the public scandal of his presence there?"

Absolutely no-one could have prevented Cardinal Mahony from taking part in and voting in the conclave. And that same statement applies equally to Cardinal O'Brien (ours, not theirs). I repeat NOBODY could have prevented either from turning up and voting. NO the Dean of the Sacred College, not the Cardinal Camerlengo, nobody. Whose advice O'Brien took to not travel to Rome I do not know but it was and could only have been advice.
Francis, The Papal Foundation and Cardinal Roger Mahony: Money Talks
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/marielena/130501

A private audience with Francis

According to the Catholic News Service (CNS is the official news service of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops) Francis met on April 11 during a private audience with "about 120 members of the [Papal] foundation and their families, including Cardinals Donald W. Wuerl of Washington; Theodore E. McCarrick, retired archbishop of Washington; and Justin Rigali, retired archbishop of Philadelphia."

Pope thanks Papal Foundation, encourages members to 'promote reconciliation at every level'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPr2i7psGFY

The Papal Foundation:
Board of Trustees
A three-tiered Board of Trustees manages Papal Foundation funds. American Cardinals who reside in the United States serve as ex-officio members of the Board. Archbishops, Bishops and elected laity from across the country serve as Trustees.

Members
Donald Cardinal Wuerl, Chairman
Archbishop of Washington, DC

Daniel Cardinal DiNardo
Archbishop of Galveston-Houston

Timothy Cardinal Dolan
Archbishop of New York

Edward Cardinal Egan
Archbishop Emeritus of New York

Francis Cardinal George, OMI
Archbishop of Chicago

William Cardinal Keeler
Archbishop Emeritus of Baltimore

Roger Cardinal Mahony
Archbishop Emeritus of Los Angeles

Adam Cardinal Maida
Archbishop Emeritus of Detroit

Theodore Cardinal McCarrick
Archbishop Emeritus of Washington, DC

Seán Patrick Cardinal O'Malley
Archbishop of Boston

Justin Cardinal Rigali
Archbishop Emeritus of Philadelphia
http://www.thepapalfoundation.com/the-foundation/board-of-trustees/

McCarrick: We’re ready for a Third World pope
http://reform-network.net/?p=19618

Cardinal Roger Mahony's reign of terror
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/marielena/130223
Lepanto said…
Mahoney voted for Pope Francis and he seems to be ready to reward and punish on that basis.
Hughie said…
According to Lepanto: "Mahoney voted for Pope Francis and he seems to be ready to reward and punish on that basis." Firstly, how does he know that Cardinal Mahony (not Mahoney) voted for Cardinal Bergoglio? The outcome of the various rounds of voting, that is who got how many votes, have, quite properly, not been made public, never mind who voted for whom. Secondly, exactly how does he propose that the now Pope Francis was able to discover who voted for him and who did not? Had there still been election by proclamation and had it been used, then he would have known. But that does not apply. And so what would have been my third point seems redundant. Since he doesn't know who voted for him and who didn't, how could he, were he so minded, reward the one and punish the other? This sort of speculation is, firstly, wholly unfounded on anything even approximating to truth, and, secondly, totally unChristian.
Nicolas Bellord said…
Hughie: Surely it is possible for a Cardinal to tell or remind a Pope how he voted for him?
Lepanto said…
Sorry, Hughie for the mis-spelling. I am normally more careful. My reasonable assumption is based on the public utterances of the Cardinal about the outcome of an election in which he had a vote. Not unreasonable, I still contend. As for the rest of it, just check who greeted the election with joy and those who did not and check their respective fates. Not brain science.