Shock and Awe

The liberal media quite rightly condemned Bush and Blair for foreign 'excursions' in the wake of 9/11 despite the fact that evidence that Iraq had anything to do with the atrocity was scant to non-existent.

Iraq was 'revenge' against the 'enemy' of the USA for 9/11 despite the fact there was no evidence to suggest that Iraq and its innocent civilians were responsible for the outrage. 

Yet, the same liberal media do not recognise that it is precisely the same logic as Bush and Blair used for Iraq that they advance for the right for a woman to procure an abortion in the case of rape. 'Someone has to pay for this! What does it matter if the person who pays is innocent!?'

We see then that Blessed Teresa of Calcutta was quite right to say that abortion is the 'biggest destroyer of peace' in the World, since the logic (if indeed, we can call it logic) advanced by the abortion movement is advanced in US foreign policy also.

An end to abortion would plausibly bring an end to war, since abortion is war.

By the way, I would like to issue an apology to the Rothschild family if it is true that Nathan Rothschild never uttered the words in a post below. Does that mean that the quote from Gutle Schnapper, wife of Mayer Amschel Rothschild is also false?

'If my sons didn't want war, then there would be none.'

Comments