Is Obama a Trojan Horse for Islam?

It sounds far fetched, doesn't it? According to The Guardian, however, Americans are becoming more unsettled on Obama's self-declared 'Christianity'.


Anyway, for those of you who, like me, like to sound cleverer than they are and who do not actually know the mythology behind the whole Trojan Horse idea, here it is from Wikipedia, the site that helps stupid people to sound intelligent.

'The Trojan Horse is a tale from the Trojan War, as told in Virgil's Latin epic poem The Aeneid and by Quintus of Smyrna. The events in this story from the Bronze Age took place after Homer's Iliad, and before his Odyssey. It was the stratagem that allowed the Greeks finally to enter the city of Troy and end the conflict. In the best-known version, after a fruitless 10-year siege, the Greeks constructed a huge wooden horse, and hid a select force of 30 men inside. The Greeks pretended to sail away, and the Trojans pulled the Horse into their city as a victory trophy. That night the Greek force crept out of the Horse and opened the gates for the rest of the Greek army, which had sailed back under cover of night. The Greek army entered and destroyed the city of Troy, decisively ending the war.'

Beware of Greeks bearing gifts in massive, er, wooden horses! To add fuel to the fire, today, blogger The Catholic Knight has given us a link to Israel Today, a Jewish newspaper, in which Israeli officials are quoted as saying that it is not Iran who is Israel's greatest threat...but Obama. Yikes and double yikes! The article begins...

'Although Israeli officials publicly play down the crisis in relations between Jerusalem and Washington, privately the language is much different. Sources close to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu describe Obama as a "strategic catastrophe" for Israel.'

It continues...

Officials in the Prime Minister's Office, speaking on condition of anonymity to the nation's top newspapers, see the Obama administration as a serious threat to the future of the State of Israel. On the record, Israel and the US have a "strategic partnership that is unbreakable"; off the record, the terminology is blunt to say the least.

"President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have drawn a clear line, supporting the Palestinian position at the expense of Israel," said one Netanyahu confidant. "It is insane, it is sick. Relations between Jerusalem and Washington are simply disastrous; the situation has never been so dangerous. This US President wants to establish a Palestinian state at any price and hand them Jerusalem on a silver platter."

Netanyahu has repeatedly distanced himself from such statements, but commentators say the government speaks with a forked tongue. "Israel's relations with the US are at a low point, and Obama poses a danger to Israel," wrote Nahum Barnea in the nation's biggest newspaper Yediot Ahronot. The feeling among the Israeli public is that Obama is appeasing the Muslim world at the expense of Israel.

And then the bombshell is dropped...

'"The American President told me in confidence that he is a Muslim," said Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit on Nile TV. That could explain why Obama has instructed that the term "Islamic extremism" no longer be used in official government documents and statements.'

This would, also, of course explain his rather lacklustre patriotism, his deep bow to the Saudi King when visiting and his recent wading into the 'Ground Zero Mosque' debate and would also serve to explain why he as recently as 2006, Barack Hussein Obama raised money and campaigned for a Kenyan presidential candidate who promised to enact Islamic Shariah Law once elected.

Of course, the Egyptian foreign minister could be telling absolute porkies and Obama does appear to be the kind of man who would tell a Jew he was Jewish, a Christian he was Christian and a Muslim he were Muslim if he thought there were some benefit in doing so, and were Obama discovered to be a Muslim (and not a very good Muslim at that, given his love for abortion and gay marriage rights) that would not be the end of the World, since Islam is a major world religion and Presidents are free to practise whatever religion they choose. However, the revelation would be very embarrassing for the administration, as he would be roundly condemned for making the habit of lying, deceiving, dissembling and downright filthy fibbing an art form hitherto unwitnessed perhaps since even the World began, having campaigned during the election as an abortion-supporting, gay marriage-supporting, Blairite Christian of the lowest denomination. Still, like the babies Obama doesn't mind being left to die in cases where an abortion procedure has 'not worked', such a brand of Christianity does have a 'shelf-life' and it wouldn't be surprising if he opted for something more, how shall we say, radical? Obama is a Trojan Horse for a whole raft of ideologically liberal policies that denigrate human dignity.

Catholic Care Loses Appeal

Whatever the truth of Obama's religious affiliation, nothing should surprise us nowadays. After all, it becomes more and more obvious that New Labour and the political success of Tony Blair was just a gigantic Trojan Horse for Peter Tatchell and militant homosexual activists. Today, as The Telegraph reports, Catholic Care, the last Catholic adoption agency faces closure after the Charity Commission that it could not avoid considering same sex parents as potential adopters. Nice one, Tony! Equality Act!? My arse! Can those kids have a sports centre too, yeah?! I mean a sports centre makes everything okay, doesn't it?!

Comments

Laurencetheracist said…
You are such a little racist tosser.. It is quite clear that you do not have any love for God or humanity, just hatred for anyone in power. 2 points: 1) your wacko religious cult was featured on News Night yesterday - made you look like the fools you are. 2) Catholic adoption agencies now have to support gays (like you) hahahahhaha
Is your name really Laurencetheracist?
By the way, your comment on Catholic adoption really does serve to highlight what your agenda is...

'Catholic adoption agencies now have to support gays...' (I'll leave off the maniacal laughing bit and spare your blushes).

No, laurencetheracist.

Catholic adoption agencies are there to support children. Not gays, or even straights, but children!

Good grief.
Laurencetheracist said…
If that's true why did the Bishops of England & Wales say they would have to 'consider their position' and that this law would 'potentially prevent them helping children'? What's more important - helping children or annoying people who are slightly different?
To be honest I think putting some poor unfortunate kid with a Catholic is bad enough - religious cults should not be allowed to brainwash children.

I honestly can't believe you think Obama is a foil for some Iranian plot. How would that even be possible? Was George Bush part of some secret Israeli plot? Do you understand anything about how the presidency works? He doesn't have unlimited power you fool, his cabinet (and the Senate) still make most of the decisions.

Anyway, take a look at that newsnight bit online - funny how even a sober journalist can't make the Cultish Cult look anything other than a nut job's lunatic party
And by the way, if the Catholic Faith naffs you off so much, why do you appear to spend so much time reading the blogs of its adherents?

Could it be because, deep down, our blogs have something you lack? That's the only reason I can imagine.

Stop torturing yourself, Bro and go read the Guardian! Nobody's keeping you reading this blog but you.
I didn't say Obama is a 'foil for an Iranian plot'. Just that if he were a Muslim (as the foreign minister of Egypt has indicated) then he could be a 'trojan horse'. You can change the entire political course of a country by, like, becoming President including foreign policy in the middle east and domestic policy concerning islamic activity. IF, it were true, the consequences would be absolutely huge. There is little denying that.
Executive Orders are a good way of skipping out democracy and Obama has been making good use of them. He has acquired more powers than his predecessors.
Why did the Bishops say that they would 'consider their position'?

Because they didn't have the balls to stand up to the atheistic Government and accept a confrontation over CATHOLIC adoption agencies being forced to become SECULAR adoption agencies or close.

They bolloxed it up because their faith is weak and Hell's agents have clearly been working on more than one or two of them for quite some time now with apparent success.
Catholics do it in secret said…
You're a sick teat Lawrence. I hope you confess all this crap when you go to confession.
catholic psychologist said…
The claim that people are putting gay rights above the rights of the children only works if you believe (and have any evidence that) gay people make worse parents. So can you now put forward the evidence.

Please note: ýou will have difficulty as there isn´t any. In fact the psychological evidence points to the opposite,
Catholics do it in secret said…
Hatred of people is a sin and spreading malicious rumours (like obama is a muslim, is not american etc) Lawrence, ask your confessor.
Catholics in the dark ages said…
US church films gay exorcism....

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2009/jun/25/gay-exorcism-connecticut-church

Have you thought of this option Lawrence, you could have the evil in you taken out
It is not a sin to be a Muslim. It is not a stain on someone's character.

We already KNOW that Obama is a liar since he claims to be Christian but supports abortion even when the procedure has gone wrong - read infanticide.
Best for children is mother and father.
Check your facts said…
Can you provide the direct source and reference which states the egyptian foreign minister saying obama told him he was a muslim. I'm guessing you'll find it was a right wing american who started the rumour for political purposes.
Why would a muslim (if that is what obama is) reguarly attend church and practice christianity
catholic psychologist said…
Best for children is mother and father.

I didn't ask for your opinion or assumptions, I asked for the evidence.
catholic psychologist said…
Because they didn't have the balls to stand up to the atheistic Government and accept a confrontation over CATHOLIC adoption agencies being forced to become SECULAR adoption agencies or close.

All this is a load of crap really. Catholic adoption agencies have always adopted to gay persons if it is right for the child. In the past they adopted to single gay persons (who may or may not have been in a relationship). The difference now is that since civil partnerships, if gay persons are in a relationship, both names must be put on the adoption papers. That is what the church finds objectionable.
Catholic christian said…
Not all christians belíeve abortion is wrong under all circumstánces lawrence (even catholics teaching does not uphold this extreme view). Obama is not a liar or a non-christian just because his beliefs are not the same as yours.
Moral theologian said…
''It is not a sin to be a Muslim. It is not a stain on someone's character.''

It most certainly is a stain on someones character if they are a practicing christian, and you use (and spread) the unfounded asserion as a slur upon their reputation.
Shakespeare's sister said…
It would have been better for the world Lawrence if you had been aborted before birth, or never conceived at all. Plus you would have been spared your angst and bitterness.
catholic psychologist said…
Are you ´really saying that there are never any circumstances where gay people would be acceptable as adoptees.

I have been involved in a few adoption cases.
1. A young girl repeatedly sexually abused and pimped out to other men by her father. She was extremely avoidant and phobia of other men. She was adopted by a loving lesbian couple and faired well in this environment.
2. A teenage boy who was disowned by his (evangelical christian)parents was adopted by a male gay couple.

Both of these seemed to me to be examples of where adoption by gay parents was in the child's best interests and entirely appropriate.

What say you
Lawrence sucks said…
Perhaps if you had been adopted by gay parents, you wouldn't hate yourself so much moron
God placed me with a mother and a father. Ever heard of the Natural Law? It's God's law of 'choice'.
Obama's agenda for abortion and possibly euthanasia in the US is wicked and condemnable.

You cannot practise Christianity while promoting the slaughter of unborn children.

That is called practising satanism.
Being gay is the new left-handedness said…
Centuries ago, the Catholic Church declared left-handed people to be servants of the Devil. For generations, left-handers who attended Catholic schools were forced to become right-handed." They justified this belief on the basis of 25 bible quotations that stigmatized left-handedness.

There are also quite a few superstitions about being left-handed. It wasn't until we realized, in the last century or so, that there are legitimate biological reasons for left-handedness, that people were no longer forced to use their right hand.

Is there not a parallel here between being left-handed and being gay
I don't know, why not research it and write a book on it?

You'll have something useful to do with your time and I don't have to read your inane comments.

We'll both be winners.
Left handers do it back-to-front said…
You miss the point Lawrence.
The church used to believe and proclaim that left handers were intrinsically disordered, that being left handed was an orientation towards an objective evil. The church sought to prevent these people practising their left handedness which would have negative effects for wider society since anything done with the left hand was the work of the devil. The church sought to restrict the rights of left handers, to physically force and punish them to use their right hands which was considered normal and natural since the majority did so. The church even killed people who refused to use their right hand justified by the church's teachings on natural law and divine inspiration.
Left handers said using their left hand was natural for them, that they were not challenging the church or hurting anyone else but the church declared them to be obstinate and ordered them to conform to god's will.
These beliefs exsisted into the modern day. My mother was beaten black and blue by nuns with a ruler across her nuckles and back of the head becuse she couldn't write with her right hand no matter how hard she tried.
Nowadays, the church doesn't believe that left handedness is evil, informed by modern science we now know that there is a biological reason and cause for being left handed. It is a natural variant of human behaviour. The church was wrong, blinded by the cultural and scientific limitations of it's time.
There is a very strong parrallel with the issue of left handedness and the church's current attitude to homosexuality. Both were supposedly supported by interpretations of scriptural excerpts. Modern science is highlighting the weeknesses and errors in the church's teaching in this area. As pope benedict said, faith must be informed be informed by reason. The church's current teaching is incompatible with science and therefore unsustainable.
Come onLawrence think for yourself matey, if you try really hard you can do it.
Anonymous said…
If and when the Muslims conduct their takeover, you are going to see a miracle. Persons who commit homosexual acts are going to disappear.

Your foe's enemy is not necessarily your friend.

And how the heck did this topic turn in that direction?